Publications

PUBLICATIONS

by IFPRI | March 21, 2018

IFPRI’s South Asia Office produces high quality, evidence-based outputs that contribute to agriculture development, food security, nutrition, and poverty alleviation to the region and beyond. In particular, IFPRI’s policy research has contributed various datasets that have emerged as global public goods, as well as technical reports, peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, donor reports, impact assessments, briefs, and more.

Sort by:

Latest

|

Year

|

Title

|

Type

Type

Themes

Regions/Countries

Year

    Language

    Can transfers and complementary nutrition programming reduce intimate partner violence four years post-program? Experimental evidence from Bangladesh
    Roy, Shalini; Hidrobo, Melissa; Hoddinott, John F.; Koch, Bastien; Ahmed, Akhter. Madison, WI Article in press

    DOI : 10.3368/jhr.0720-11014R2
    Abstract | View

    Little is known about whether reductions in intimate partner violence (IPV) from transfer programs persist. Using a randomized controlled trial, we find that women in rural Bangladesh who received cash transfers with complementary nutrition programming (including group-based training, home visits, and community meetings) experienced sustained reductions in IPV four years after the program ended. Neither cash transfers alone, nor food transfers with or without complementary nutrition programming, showed sustained impacts on IPV. Evidence suggests that cash with complementary nutrition programming sustained IPV reductions through persistent increases in women’s bargaining power, costs to men of perpetrating violence, and men’s emotional well-being.
    Examining export advantages in Indian horticulture: An approach based on product mapping and seasonality
    Saxena, Reka; Kumar, Anjani; Singh, Ritambhara; Paul, Ranjit Kumar; Raman, M. S.; Kumar, Rohit; Khan, Mohd Arshad; Agarwal, Priyanka. Article in press

    DOI : 10.1108/JADEE-12-2021-0310
    Cash transfers and women’s agency: Evidence from Pakistan’s BISP program
    Ambler, Kate; de Brauw, Alan. Article in press

    DOI : 10.1086/722966
    Does relative deprivation condition the effects of social protection programs on political support? Experimental evidence from Pakistan
    Kosec, Katrina; Mo, Cecilia Hyunjung. Article in press

    DOI : 10.1111/ajps.12767
    Abstract | View

    Could perceived relative economic standing affect citizens’ support for political leaders and institutions? We explore this question by examining Pakistan's national unconditional cash transfer program, the Benazir Income Support Program (BISP). Leveraging a regression discontinuity approach using BISP's administrative data and an original survey experiment, we find that perceptions of relative deprivation color citizen reactions to social protection. When citizens do not feel relatively deprived, receiving cash transfers has little sustained effect on individuals’ reported level of support for their political system and its leaders. However, when citizens feel relatively worse off, those receiving cash transfers become more politically satisfied while those denied transfers become more politically disgruntled. Moreover, the magnitude of the reduction in political support among non-beneficiaries is larger than the magnitude of the increase in political support among beneficiaries. This has important implications for our understanding of the political ramifications of rising perceived inequality.
    Determinants and impacts of contract farming: Evidence from cultivation of onion, okra and pomegranate in Maharashtra, India
    Kumar, Anjani; Roy, Devesh; Tripathi, Gaurav; Joshi, Pramod Kumar. Article in press

    DOI : 10.1108/JADEE-05-2022-0094
    Adoption and impact of hybrid rice in India: Evidence from a large-scale field survey
    Negi, Digvijay Singh; Kumar, Anjani; Birthal, Pratap Singh; Tripathi, Gaurav. Article in press

    DOI : 10.1108/JADEE-05-2023-0118
    Analyzing hypertension and diabetes mellitus status among Bangladeshi adults: evidence from Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (BDHS) 2017–18 data
    Hasan, Md. Rokibul; Islam, Md. Momin; Noor, Farha Musharrat; Ali, Masum; Alam, Md. Mashud . Article in press

    DOI : 10.1007/s10389-023-01987-1
    Increasing production diversity and diet quality: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Ahmed, Akhter; Coleman, Fiona; Ghostlaw, Julie; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima; Parvin, Aklima; Pereira, Audrey; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini; Younus, Masuma. Article in Press

    DOI : 10.1111/ajae.12427
    Abstract | View

    In the context of rural Bangladesh, we assess whether agriculture training alone, nutrition behavior communication change (BCC) alone, combined agriculture training and nutrition BCC, or agriculture training and nutrition BCC combined with gender sensitization improve: (a) production diversity, either on household fields or through crop, livestock, or aquaculture activities carried out near the family homestead; and (b) diet diversity and the quality of household diets. All treatment arms were implemented by government employees. Implementation quality was high. No treatment increased production diversification of crops grown on fields. Treatment arms with agricultural training did increase the number of different crops grown in homestead gardens and the likelihood of any egg, dairy, or fish production but the magnitudes of these effect sizes were small. All agricultural treatment arms had, in percentage terms, large effects on measures of levels of homestead production. However, because baseline levels of production were low, the magnitude of these changes in absolute terms was modest. Nearly all treatment arms improved measures of food consumption and diet with the largest effects found when nutrition and agriculture training were combined. Relative to treatments combining agriculture and nutrition training, we find no significant impact of adding the gender sensitization on our measures of production diversity or diet quality. Interventions that combine agricultural training and nutrition BCC can improve both production diversity and diet quality, but they are not a panacea. They can, however, contribute toward better diets of rural households.

    1 to 10 of 240

    Back to top