IFPRI Datasets: Pakistan
|
|
|
Type
Themes
Regions/Countries
Year
Language
Datasets
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Master of Environmental Policy Program (iMEP), Duke Kunshan University; Department of Environmental Studies, New York University; University of Agriculture-Faisalabad, Pakistan. Washington, DC; 2018
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) . Washington, DC 2017
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2016
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data on the harvest from each picking and the total sales of cotton. Round 1.3 was implemented between January-February in 2014, immediately after the last harvest. Data were collected from the households sampled in Round 1.1. Of the original sample of 728 households, 46 chose not to grow cotton in kharif 2013, 70 lost their crops to flood or other natural disasters, four migrated and eight dropped out in the second- or third-round surveys.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data related to input use and pesticide poisoning symptoms up to the first picking of cotton. Round 1.2 was implemented between September-November in 2013, during or immediately following the first picking. Data were collected from the households sampled in Round 1.1. Of the original sample of 728 households, 46 chose not to grow cotton in kharif 2013, 70 lost their crops to flood or other natural disasters, four migrated and eight dropped out in the second- or third-round surveys.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). It collected data on household, farm and plot characteristics of cotton growers. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews with 728 farmers who were selected in a statistically representative sample of all cotton-growing agroclimatic zones in both Punjab and Sindh Provinces, accounting for more than 99 percent of the cotton cultivated in Pakistan. The first round was implemented between March-May in 2013, soon after participants planted cotton.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The collection, tests, and analysis of the cotton tissue (leaves and bolls) was led by the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (UAF), and the National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), Islamabad, in collaboration with International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), and Innovative Development Studies. Two different tests were carried out. The first one was the strip test that test for the presence or absence of the Cry1Ac protein. The second was the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that quantifies the expression level of this protein. Two rounds of tests were conducted, the first at approximately 70 days after sowing (DAS) and the second at approximately 120 DAS. The resultant dataset combines information from 593 sampled households with corresponding plant tissue diagnostics from 70 DAS, as well as information from 589 sampled households with corresponding diagnostics from 120 DAS.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (Pvt) Ltd.; National Institute of Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Center (NARC); Office of Research, Innovation, and Commercialization (ORIC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF); Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad (UAF). Washington, DC 2016
The survey was designed by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and implemented by Innovative Development Studies (IDS). The sample selection of seed dealers involved three steps: i) identification of markets from where most of the survey households in our sample for the study purchase seeds; ii) preparation of a list of all cotton seed dealers in these identified markets; and iii) selection of five seed dealers in each market and collect samples of three top selling varieties.
The household survey identified that nearly 32 percent of the selected cotton growers purchased seeds from markets. These markets were located in 42 tehsils. Keeping in view the representation of all agroecological zones (AEZs) of cotton growing areas, 27 tehsil markets were randomly selected. A list of cotton seed dealers and cotton varieties that they purchased to sell in (kharif) 2015 were prepared in the selected tehsil markets. A cotton seed dealer is defined as a vendor of cotton seed. From the dealer listing, five seed dealers were selected randomly and subsequently top three selling cotton seed varieties per dealer were selected. In total, we had 135 seed dealers in our sample. A structured questionnaire was administered to collect information on the sale, purchase, and inventory of cotton seed varieties. Seeds of selected three cotton varieties were collected from each seed dealer. In total seeds of 404 cotton seed samples were collected. These samples were packed in bags and sent to the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for DNA fingerprinting.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2015
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); Innovative Development Strategies (IDS). Washington, DC 2014