BANGLADESH
IFPRI Publications on Bangladesh
|
|
|
Type
Themes
Regions/Countries
Year
Language
Banerjee, Archis; Kumar, Neha; Quisumbing, Agnes R.. 2024
Adong, Annet; Ambler, Kate; Bloem, Jeffrey R.; de Brauw, Alan; Herskowitz, Sylvan; Islam, AHM Saiful; Wagner, Julia. 2024
IFPRI. 2024
Takeshima, Hiroyuki; Kishore, Avinash; Kumar, Anjani. 2024
Tauseef, Salauddin; Sufian, Farha Deba. 2024
Mustafa, Shoumi; Ali, A M M Shawkat; Islam, Kazi Nurul; Dorosh, Paul A.; Rashid, Shahidur; Shaima, Nabila Afrin. 2024
Alam, Md. Monjurul; Kalita, Prasanta Kumar; Saha, Chayan Kumer; Sarkar, Surajit; Winter-Nelson, Alex. 2024
Dorosh, Paul A.; Mustafa, Shoumi; Kabir, Razin Iqbal; Shaima, Nabila Afrin. 2024
Narayanan, Sudha; Hussain, Siraj; Rashid, Shahidur. 2024
Nguyen, Phuong; Mai, Lan T.; Kachwaha, Shivani; Sanghvi, Tina; Mahmud, Zeba; Zafimanjaka, Maurice G.; Walissa, Tamirat; Ghosh, Sebanti; Kim, Sunny S.. 2024
Ecker, Olivier; Comstock, Andrew R.; de Brauw, Alan; Diao, Xinshen; Talukder, Md. Ruhul Amin. 2024
Ambler, Kate; Bloem, Jeffrey R.; de Brauw, Alan; Herskowitz, Sylvan; Wagner, Julia. 2024
Minot, Nicholas; Hossain, Shahadat; Kabir, Razin; Dorosh, Paul A.; Rashid, Shahidur. 2024
Verger, Eric O.; Eymard-Duvernay, Sabrina; Bahya-Batinda, Dang; Hanley-Cook, Giles T.; Argaw, Alemayehu; Becquey, Elodie; Diop, Loty; Gelli, Aulo; Harris-Fry, Helen; Kachwaha, Shivani; Kim, Sunny S.; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Saville, Naomi M.; Tran, Lan Mai; Zagré, Rock R.; Landais, Edwige; Savy, Mathilde; Martin-Prevel, Yves; Lachat, Carl. 2024
Chowdhury, Shyamal; Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Mallick, Debdulal; Raghunathan, Kalyani; Rashid, Shahidur. 2024
Islam, Mir Raihanul; Angell, Blake; Naher, Nahitun; Islam, Bushra Zarin; Khan, Mushtaq Husain; McKee, Martin; Hutchinson, Eleanor; Balabanova, Dina; Ahmed, Syed Masud. 2024
Ali, Masum; Amin, Md. Ruhul; Jarl, Johan; Saha, Sanjib. 2024
Neufeld, Lynnette M.; Nordhagen, Stella; Leroy, Jef L.; Aberman, Noora-Lisa; Barnett, Inka; Wouabe, Eric Djimeu. 2024
Hoddinott, John; Ahmed, Akhter; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Rakshit, Deboleena. Washington, DC 2023
Sufian, Farha D.; Alvi, Muzna Fatima; Ratna, Nazmun N.; Ringler, Claudia; Choudhury, Zahid ul Arefin. Washington, DC 2023
Ambler, Kate; Bloem, Jeffrey R.; de Brauw, Alan; Islam, Saiful; Wagner, Julia. Washington, DC 2023
Ambler, Kate; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; de Brauw, Alan; Uddin, Mohammad Riad. Washington, DC 2023
Microfinance has emerged as a crucial intervention in bridging this gap. However, the fixed and rigid repayment structures of microfinance institutions (MFIs) often clash with the seasonal nature of agricul tural production. This mismatch creates financial strain for farmers, who must manage cash flows that are inherently unpredictable due to factors like weather variability and market fluctuations. These challenges underscore the need for more flexible and tailored financial solutions.
Coleman, Fiona M.; Ahmed, Akhter; Roy, Shalini; Hoddinott, John. Washington, DC 2023
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Hoddinott, John F.. 2023
Hasan, Md. Rokibul; Islam, Md. Momin; Noor, Farha Musharrat; Ali, Masum; Alam, Md. Mashud . Article in press
Hauer, Mathew E.; Fussell, Elizabeth; Mueller, Valerie; Burkett, Maxine; Call, Maia; Abel, Kali; McLeman, Robert; Wrathall, David. 2020
Ahmed, Akhter U.; Hoddinott, John; Roy, Shalini; Sraboni, Esha. 2024
Barrett, Christopher B.. Washington, DC; Oxford, UK 2023
Lecoutere, Els; Mishra, Avni; Singaraju, Niyati; Koo, Jawoo; Azzarri, Carlo; Chanana, Nitya; Nico, Gianluigi; Puskur, Ranjitha . 2023
Sufian, Farha D.; Nico, Gianluigi; Azzarri, Carlo. Washington, DC 2023
Mastura, Tamanna; Begum, Ismat Ara; Kishore, Avinash; Jackson, Tamara; Woodhill, Jim; Chatterjee, Kuhu; Alam, Mohammad Jahangir . 2023
Kamar, Abul; Roy, Devesh; Pradhan, Mamata; Saroj, Sunil. Washington, DC 2023
Trade moves food from surplus to deficit regions and hence is crucial for maintaining a stable food supply. Historically, the global supply of cereals has been stable (Bradford et al. 2022); this implies that trade (or the lack of it) can be directly mapped onto area-specific food insecurity. At the same time, shocks leading to trade disruption can pose serious challenges, particularly for countries with high import penetration in food.
Cooper, Bethany; Crase, Lin; Burton, Michael; Rigby, Dan; Alam, Mohammad Jahangir; Kishore, Avinash . 2023
Ignowski, Liz; Belton, Ben; Ali, Hazrat; Thilsted, Shakuntala Haraksingh . 2023
Kabir, Razin Iqbal; Narayanan, Sudha; Belton, Ben; Hernandez, Ricardo; Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul. Washington, DC 2023
The complex nature of shrimp supply chains in Bangladesh, comprised of hundreds of thousands of small polyculture farms and tens of thousands of small traders, make it difficult to implement tracea bility and certification initiatives – now a prerequisite for entry into most supermarket supply chains.
This report provides an overview of the sector and the challenges it faces, drawing on secondary and survey data, reviews of government reports and academic literature. We also report the findings of an expert consultation conducted to identify key constraints and potential solutions.
The consensus among industry stakeholders who were part of the expert consultations is that issues related to the supply and quality of shrimp seed and pond management practices represent some of the most pressing, yet relatively simple-to-solve challenges currently faced by the sector. This would serve as the foundation for establishing traceability and certification processes. Previous interventions aimed at upgrading production practices (such as promoting stocking of disease-free shrimp seed) and facilitating disintermediation and transparency in the supply chain (such as by establishing producer groups, shrimp collection centers, and contracts with processors), have met with limited success. We outline potential interventions and partners that might offer scalable solutions enabling small shrimp farmers to access global markets.
Ahmed, Akhter; Coleman, Fiona; Ghostlaw, Julie; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima; Parvin, Aklima; Pereira, Audrey; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini; Younus, Masuma. Article in Press
De Groote, Bram; Olaerts, Astrid; Herens, Marion; Dengerink, Just; Namugumya Shenute, Brenda; ten Hove, Hermine. Washington, DC 2023
Neupane, Sumanta; Jangid, Manita; Scott, Samuel P.; Kim, Sunny S.; Murira, Zivai; Heidkamp, Rebecca; Carducci, Bianca; Menon, Purnima. 2024
Hossain, Mahabub. Washington, DC 2009
Iqbal, Anwar, ed.; del Ninno, Carlo, ed.; Thilsted, Shakuntala Haraksingh, ed.. Dhaka, Bangladesh; Washington, DC 1999
Bouis, Howarth E.. 2002
Ali, Hazrat; Belton, Ben; Haque, Mohammad Mahfujul; Murshed-e-Jahan, Khondker. 2023
Coleman, Fiona M.; Ahmed, Akhter U.; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini; Hoddinott, John. 2023
Objective: Using 2012 and 2016 data, we aimed to examine gender differences in diet quantity and quality among ultrapoor and farm households in rural Bangladesh.
Methods: The study used baseline 24-h dietary data from 2 randomized control trials conducted in rural Bangladesh: the Transfer Modality Research Initiative (ultrapoor households) and the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages project (farm households). Ordinary least squares regressions with household-level fixed effects tested for gender differences among constructed diet measures, such as caloric intake, caloric adequacy ratio, dietary diversity score, global diet quality score, and probability of consuming moderate or high levels of healthy food groups.
Results: In both samples, on average, women consumed fewer calories than men in the same households but consumed near equal or more in reference to their caloric needs. Women scored <1% lower than men on diet quality indicators and showed similar probabilities to men of consuming healthy foods. Most men and women in both samples were calorically inadequate (>60%) and recorded poor diet quality scores that indicated high risk of nutrient inadequacy and chronic disease (>95%).
Conclusions: In both ultrapoor and farm households, although men record higher intake quantities and diet quality scores, the apparent male advantage disappear when energy requirements and the magnitudes of difference are considered. Diets of men and women in these rural Bangladeshi households are equitable but suboptimal.
Diao, Xinshen; Ellis, Mia; Pauw, Karl; Pradesha, Angga; Randriamamonjy, Josee; Thurlow, James. Washington, DC 2023
Alam, Mohammad Jahangir; Begum, Ismat Ara; Mastura, Tamanna; Kishore, Avinash; Woodhill, Jim; Chatterjee, Kuhu; Jackson, Tamara. 2023
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Sununtnasuk, Celeste; Christopher, Anita; Ash, Deborah; Ireen, Santhia; Kabir, Rowshan; Mahmud, Zeba; Ali, Mohsin; Forissier, Thomas; Escobar-DeMarco, Jessica; Frongillo, Edward A.; Menon, Purnima. 2023
Objectives: We assessed the impact of integrating maternal, infant, and young child nutrition interventions, delivered at urban Maternal Neonatal and Child Health facilities, on maternal dietary diversity, iron-folic acid (IFA) and calcium consumption, and child feeding practices.
Methods: We used a quasi-experimental design with a non-random assignment of 20 health facilities in Dhaka to intensive and standard service arms. We conducted facility-based observations and community-based surveys at baseline (2020) and endline (2022) (n=2,455 observations and surveys with 1,678 pregnant [PW] or recently delivered women [RDW] at endline). We derived difference-in-difference (DID) estimates, adjusted for characteristics that differed at baseline or endline, and accounted for clustering.
Results: Exposure to antenatal care (ANC) was similar in both arms: two-thirds of RDW received ANC during the first trimester and three-fourths received ≥4 ANC check-ups.
Compared to the standard arm, a higher proportion of PW in the intensive arm received counselling on dietary diversity (DID: 45 percentage points [pp]), and a higher proportion of RDW received IFA (25pp) and calcium supplementation (19pp), adequate weight gain (44pp), and appropriate child feeding (27pp). Improvements were greater in the intensive than standard arm for number of food groups consumed (DID: 1.1 food groups) and minimum dietary diversity (23pp); no impact was observed for IFA and calcium consumption during pregnancy. Impacts were observed for early initiation (20pp), exclusive breastfeeding (45pp), introduction of solid or semi-solid foods (28pp), and egg and/or flesh food consumption (33pp) among children. Minimum dietary diversity and acceptable diet remained low in both arms.
Conclusions: Intensifying nutrition in government-aligned health services delivered by experienced NGO-run facilities is a feasible model to address the urban health gap, nutrition services coverage, and improved practices.
Ahmed, Akhter; Coleman, Fiona; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima; Parvin, Aklima; Pereira, Audrey; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini. 2023
Alam, Mohammad Jahangir; Kabir, A. N.; Mastura, Tamanna; Kishore, Avinash; Jackson, Tamara; Begum, Ismat Ara. 2023
Yesmin, Maksuda; Ali, Masum; Saha, Sanjib . 2023
Early detection of diabetes and hypertension is helpful to prevent and/or delay the onset of these diseases through proper interventions. Therefore, it is a prerequisite to know the prevalence of prediabetes and prehypertension and the factors associated with these conditions but people from developing countries including Bangladesh often remain undiagnosed and unaware of these conditions. In this study we investigate the prevalence of prediabetes and prehypertension and their associated factors in Bangladesh using nationally representative data.
Method
We used nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017–18 survey data, which included a total sample of 14,704 adults aged 18 years and more from whom blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose were collected. Chi-square test was used to examine the differences between sociodemographic and outcome variables. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the factors associated with prediabetes and prehypertension.
Results
Overall, the prevalence of prediabetes and prehypertension was 8.6% with 14% of the sampled population having from prediabetes and prehypertension separately. Among the prediabetic and prehypertensive participants, one-fourth of the participant were from the richest families and around one-third were overweight/obese, while more than fifty percent had normal Body Mass Index (BMI) and completed secondary and higher education. In the univariate analysis, the richest wealth status (UOR 3.3, 95% CI: 2.46 -4.35) and overweight/obesity (UOR 3.2, 95% CI: 2.62–3.85) are the highest predictors for prediabetes and prehypertension. After adjusting the other variables, overweight/obesity remains the largest predictor for prediabetes and prehypertension (AOR:2.5, 95% CI:2.05–3.05). Further, people aged 31 and above and from the richest family had around 2 times and 1.8 times higher risk of being prediabetic and prehypertensive compared to the younger age people (18–30 years) and the poorest family (respectively).
Conclusion
The coexistence of prediabetes and prehypertension is an early sign of a greater burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in the near future for Bangladesh. To reduce the higher burden of NCDs, our findings call for a multisectoral approach to identify the precondition of NCDs with particular attention to maintaining body weight.
Sanghvi, Tina; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Forissier, Thomas; Ghosh, Sebanti; Zafimanjaka, Maurice; Walissa, Tamirat; Mahmud, Zeba; Kim, Sunny S.. 2023
Neupane, Sumanta; Scott, Samuel; Piwoz, Ellen; Kim, Sunny S.; Menon, Purnima; Nguyen, Phuong Hong. 2023
Mamun, Abdullah; Glauber, Joseph W.; Laborde Debucquet, David. Washington, DC 2023
The conflict threatens Bangladesh’s recent progress on this front. With a population of 165 million in 2021 — with 38% employed by the griculture and fisheries sector — and a growing economy, the country’s undernourished population declined from a high of 16% in 2000 to as low as 9.7% in 2019. While the COVID-19 pandemic increased food insecurity, by some measures the country proved relatively resilient: According to an IFPRI study, the proportion of rural households facing moderate or severe food insecurity rose from 15% in early 2020 to 45% in January 2021, then returned to pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2021.
Bliznashka, Lilia; Roy, Aditi; Christiani, David C.; Calafat, Antonia M.; Ospina, Maria; Diao, Nancy; Mazumdar, Maitreyi; Jaacks, Lindsay M.. 2023
Methods: We used data from 284 mother-child pairs participating in a birth cohort established in 2008. Eight urinary pesticide biomarkers were quantified in early pregnancy (mean gestational age 11.6±2.9 weeks) as an index of pesticide exposure. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition were administered at 20–40 months of age. Associations between creatinine-adjusted urinary pesticide biomarker concentrations and child development scores were estimated using multivariable generalised linear models. We searched ten databases up to November 2021 to identify prospective studies on pregnancy pesticide exposure and child development conducted in LMICs. We used a random-effects model to pool similar studies, including our original analysis. The systematic review was pre-registered with PROSPERO: CRD42021292919.
Results: In the Bangladesh cohort, pregnancy 2-isopropyl-4-methyl-6-hydroxypyrimidine (IMPY) concentrations were inversely associated with motor development (-0.66 points [95% CI -1.23, -0.09]). Pregnancy 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCPY) concentrations were inversely associated with cognitive development, but the association was small: -0.02 points (-0.04, 0.01). We observed no associations between 4-nitrophenol and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) concentrations and child development. The systematic review included 13 studies from four LMICs. After pooling our results with one other study, we found consistent evidence that pregnancy 3-PBA concentrations were not associated with cognitive, language, or motor development.
Conclusion: Evidence suggests that pregnancy exposure to some organophosphate pesticides is negatively associated with child development. Interventions to reduce in-utero pesticide exposure in LMICs may help protect child development.
Nassif, Gabriella; Bhuiyan, Muhammad Mahbubul; Zahir, Md; Abdulrahim, Sawsan; Ringler, Claudia. Washington, DC 2023
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Gilligan, Daniel O.; Hoddinott, John F.; Roy, Shalini. 2023
Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small Scale Irrigation. 2023
Chowdhury, Tahreen Tahrima; Dorosh, Paul A.; Islam, Rizwana; Pradesha, Angga. Washington, DC 2023
Owais, Aatekah; Rizvi, Arjumand; Jawwad, Muhammad; Horton, Susan; Das, Jai K.; Merritt, Catherine; Moreno, Ralfh; Asfaw, Atnafu G.; Rutter, Paul; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Menon, Purnima; Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.. 2023
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2023
Seager, Jennifer; Baird, Sarah; Kalow, Jared; Tauseef, Salauddin. 2023
Alvi, Muzna; Ratna, Muzna; Sufian, Farha; Khan, Mohidul Hoque; Ringler, Claudia. London, England; Washington, DC 2023
Khatun, Wajiha; Fakhry, Hager; Herens, Marion. Washington, DC 2023
In addition, the SHiFT country engagement approach is looking to connect with and strengthen existing stakeholder (coordination) mechanisms or platforms in food system transformation rather than establish new collaborative structures. Applying a stakeholder platform mapping tool to detect (coordination) structures engaged around food system issues, existing platforms, and networks are identified.
Saroj, Sunil; Roy, Devesh; Kamar, Abul; Pradhan, Mamata. Washington, DC 2023
The innovations in international trade literature that explains both the emergence as well as levels and the nature of trade flows through value chain integration necessitates examining trade-based exchanges at the highest possible levels of product disaggregation. Developments in trade theory emphasize that it is individual firms not countries that trade and analysis needs to incorporate firm characteristics in decisions and ability for exporting and importing. Firms are the appropriate unit of analysis for trade flows. It helps several paradoxes once the import of firm heterogeneity is understood.
Despite the substantive importance of granular level data and the significant level of disaggregated product-level bilateral trade flow data and enhanced computing power that are becoming available, most studies have tended to rely on analysis with high level of aggregation. Recent research on firm heterogeneity in international trade highlights the importance of extensive margins i.e., new products, new partners, new varieties, and cumulative of these i.e., new prices in trade patterns and firms' responses to trade liberalization and other policy changes. However, the high dimensionality of the data and the large number of responses to changes can easily overwhelm researchers. Additionally, bigger data sets may contain more noise, which can mask important systematic patterns. In analysis of trade flows, notwithstanding the rising incidence of differentiated products (varieties) and value chains that transcend national boundaries, methods in agri-food trade analysis in particular have not kept pace in terms of empirical methods and suitable data.
Dorosh, Paul A.; Pauw, Karl; Pradesha, Angga; Thurlow, James. 2023
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Malapit, Hazel J.; Ghostlaw, Julie. Washington, DC 2023
Kamar, Abul; Roy, Devesh. Washington, DC 2023
in intra-regional trade among BIMSTEC member countries. Importantly the low share of intra BIMSTEC trade is not due to greater integration with supra-BIMSTEC partners. This policy note seeks to spell out some of the key agricultural trade policy-related challenges in the BIMSTEC region and their implications for economic integration in the area.
Ecker, Olivier; Alderman, Harold; Comstock, Andrew R.; Headey, Derek D.; Mahrt, Kristi; Pradesha, Angga. 2023
Moucheraud, Corrina; Epstein, Adrienne; Sarma, Haribondhu; Kim, Sunny S.; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Menon, Purnima. 2023
Methods: We use data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial design, including repeated cross-sectional surveys with health workers in 2010 (baseline, n = 290), 2014 (endline, n = 511) and 2017 (post-endline, n = 600). Health workers in 10 sub-districts were trained and incentivized to deliver intensified IYCF counseling, and participated in social mobilization activities, while health workers in 10 comparison sub-districts delivered standard counseling activities. Accompanying mass media and policy change activities occurred at the national level. The primary outcome is quality of IYCF service delivery (number of IYCF messages reportedly communicated during counseling); intermediate outcomes are IYCF knowledge, job satisfaction, and job readiness. We also assess the role of hypothesized modifiers of program sustainment, i.e. activities of the program: comprehensiveness of refresher trainings and receipt of financial incentives. Multivariable difference-in-difference linear regression models, including worker characteristic covariates and adjusted for clustering at the survey sampling level, are used to compare differences between groups (intervention vs. comparison areas) and over time (baseline, endline, post-endline).
Results: At endline, health workers in intervention areas discussed significantly more IYCF topics than those in comparison areas (4.9 vs. 4.0 topics, p < 0.001), but levels decreased and the post-endline gap was no longer significant (4.0 vs. 3.3 topics, p = 0.067). Comprehensive refresher trainings were protective against deterioration in service delivery. Between baseline and endline, the intervention increased health workers' knowledge (3.5-point increase in knowledge scores in intervention areas, vs. 1.5-point increase in comparison areas, p < 0.0001); and this improvement persisted to post-endline, suggesting a sustained program effect on knowledge. Job satisfaction and readiness both saw improvements among workers in intervention areas during the project period (baseline to endline) but regressed to a similar level as comparison areas by post-endline. Discussion: Our study showed sustained impact of IYCF interventions on health workers' knowledge, but not job satisfaction or job readiness—and, critically, no sustained program effect on service delivery. Programs of limited duration may seek to assess the status of and invest in protective factors identified in this study (e.g., refresher trainings) to encourage sustained impact of improved service delivery. Studies should also prioritize collecting post-endline data to empirically test and refine concepts of sustainment.
Kabir, Razin; Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Narayanan, Sudha; Rashid, Shahidur. 2023
Bloem, Jeffrey R.; Rahman, Khandker Wahedur. Mokakhali, Dhaka 2023
del Ninno, Carlo; Dorosh, Paul A.. Washington, D.C. 2002
Aragie, Emerta; Pauw, Karl; Thurlow, James. Washington, DC 2023
Malapit, Hazel J.; Heckert, Jessica; Adegbola, Patrice Ygué; Crinot, Geraud Fabrice; Eissler, Sarah; Faas, Simone; Gantoli, Geoffroy; Kalagho, Kenan; Martinez, Elena; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Mswero, Grace; Myers, Emily; Mzungu, Diston; Pereira, Audrey; Pinkstaff, Crossley; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Ragasa, Catherine; Rubin, Deborah; Seymour, Greg; Tauseef, Salauddin; GAAP2 Market Inclusion Study Team. Washington, DC 2023
Babu, Suresh Chandra; Zhou, Yuan; Khan, Reza; Srivastava, Nandita. 2021
This report is part of an international multi-country comparative study on youth entrepreneurship in agribusiness. It uses a conceptual framework on key drivers of the success of youth entrepreneurship. It provides a literature review of the status of the policy, institutional, technological, business, and individual environments that support youth entrepreneurship in Bangladesh. A case study approach is used to understand the support and constraints faced by existing rural and urban YEs. Using the insights from the literature and case studies, key lessons and recommendations are provided to strengthen youth entrepreneurship in the agriculture sector in Bangladesh.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2002
Ecker, Olivier; Alderman, Harold; Comstock, Andrew R.; Headey, Derek D.; Mahrt, Kristi; Pradesha, Angga. Washington, DC 2023
In this study, we examine the effects of stylized economic shocks on household incomes in Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Indonesia, with a focus on the difference between recommended and actual consumption of particular foods and nutrients. To this end, we use a novel combination of three integrated models to examine impacts and experiment with different types of social protection interventions. In Bangladesh and Indonesia, these are stylized models of the COVID-19 shock and government lock-downs; in Myanmar, however, we model the economic instability that took place after the February 2021 military takeover, which – in conjunction with COVID-19 impacts – resulted in an estimated 18 percent contraction in GDP (World Bank 2022).
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Ali, Masum; Ghostlaw, Julie; Nguyen, Phuong Hong. 2022
Smith, Lisa C.; Byron, Elizabeth. Washington, DC 2005
Ahmed, Akhter U.; Arends-Kuenning, Mary. Washington, DC 2003
Ecker, Olivier; Alderman, Harold; Comstock, Andrew R.; Headey, Derek D.; Mahrt, Kristi; Pradesha, Angga. Washington, DC 2023
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Guiteras, Raymond; Levinsohn, James; Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq. 2023
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Rabbani, Atonu. 2022
Chowdhury, Reajul Alam; Alam, Md. Monjurul; Ali, Md. Rostom; Awal, Md. Abdul; Hossain, Shahadat; Kalita, Prasanta Kumar; Saha, Chayan Kumer; Winter-Nelson, Alex. Washington, DC 2021
This paper explores the lack of widespread private investment in improved grain storage and examines the potential for public support to stimulate greater private sector investment in modern storage. We calculate the returns to investment in bulk grain silos and hermetic cocoons that could upgrade warehouse storage, and calculate the grain loss that conversion to those technologies would prevent. We then assess the public support that would be required to trigger private investment in modern storage systems.
Tsakirpaloglou, Nikolaos; Bueno-Mota, Gela; Soriano, Jessica Candace; Arcillas, Erwin; Yu, Su-May, Bouis, Howarth; Arines, Felichi Mae; Stangoulis, James; Trijatmiko, Kurniawan Rudi; Reinke, Russell; Tohme, Joseph; Slamet-Loedin, Inez H.. 2023
Herrington, Caitlin; Maredia, Mywish K.; Ortega, David L.; Taleon, Victor; Birol, Ekin; Sarkar, Md Abdur Rouf; Rahaman, Md Shajedur. 2023
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Uddin, Riad; Shamma, Raisa. Washington, DC 2022
Many of the recent innovations in the agricultural sector in Bangladesh have been initiated by ‘AgriTech’ companies/start-ups in the space of financial and logistical services. Financial services are available for both small and large-scale agriculture operations in the country. Besides innovations in fi nancial services, there has been a burgeoning list of logistical services as well. Utilizing this wave of innovations appropriately can help the agricultural sector reach its full potential for success.
This report is arranged in the following manner. First section 1 discusses the traditional services in fi nancial and logistic sectors, and then section 2 discusses the existing constraints in both sectors. Sec tions 3 and 4 go into detail on financial and logistical innovations respectively that aim at addressing the discussed constraints. Both sections 3 and 4 have subsections giving a brief description of organiza tions that are behind these innovations.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2022
The purpose of the Bangladesh Feed the Future Phase 2 ZOI 2018/2019 Baseline Survey, referred to as the Feed the Future Bangladesh ZOI Baseline Survey 2018/2019 throughout this report, is to provide the U.S. Government interagency partners, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau for Resilience and Food Security (RFS), USAID/Bangladesh, the Government of Bangladesh, and development partners with information on the current status of the Feed the Future ZOI-level population-based survey indicators.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2020
The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) produced this report for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau for Resilience and Food Security (RFS), USAID/Bangladesh, the Government of Bangladesh, and development partners. The report compares indicator estimates and select demographic and household characteristics from the 2018/2019 ZOI Survey, which serves as the Feed the Future Phase One endline survey, with the baseline assessment conducted in 2011/2012 in Bangladesh. This report only includes the Feed the Future Phase One indicators. Secondary data sources are used when needed or appropriate.
The Feed the Future Phase One ZOI in Bangladesh includes mostly rural areas in 20 districts consisting of 120 upazilas (sub-districts) in three divisions in the south and southwest region of the country.
This assessment provides information about progress on Feed the Future Phase One ZOI indicators. The assessment is designed to show changes in key indicator estimates from the Feed the Future Phase One baseline assessment to the endline assessment. The Feed the Future ZOI Survey endline assessment, however, was not designed to support conclusions of causality or program attribution.
Ahmed, Akhter U.; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Nasreen, Mahbuba; Hoddinott, John; Bryan, Elizabeth. Washington, D.C. 2009
Gupta, Manavi; Kishore, Avinash; Scott, Samuel; Chakraborty, Shreya; Chellattan, Prakashan Veettil; Choudhury, Samira; Krupnik, Timothy; Kumar, Neha; Neupane, Sumanta; Patwardhan, Sharvari; Sununtnasuk, Celeste; Urfels, Anton; Menon, Purnima. Washington, DC 2022
TAFSSA (Transforming Agrifood Systems in South Asia), a CGIAR Regional Integrated Initiative, aims to address these challenges by delivering actionable evidence and scalable innovations across these regions through a coordinated program of research and engagement from farmer to consumer.
One of the roadblocks to addressing these challenges is the lack of credible and high-resolution data on food systems in the region. The TAFSSA food systems assessment aims to provide a reliable, accessible and integrated evidence base that links farm production, market access, dietary patterns, climate risk responses, and natural resource management in Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan. It is intended to be a multi-year assessment.
Scott, Samuel; Neupane, Sumanta; Menon, Purnima; Kishore, Avinash; Krupnik, Timothy. Washington, DC 2022
This research note presents findings on the availability of diet-related data in publiclyavailable population-based surveys conducted in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan in the last decade. It is intended to be used by researchers and policymakers to understand the data landscape and identify measurement priorities for future surveys.
KEY FINDINGS
• Data on diets for older children and adolescents are captured less frequently than
for younger children and women of reproductive age.
• Data are mostly available on food group consumption and for infants and young
children; data on consumption of unhealthy foods is poor.
• Few surveys capture quantity of foods consumed; estimating nutrient intake from
population-based surveys is therefore not possible.
• Only Bangladesh currently has large-scale publicly available and repeated rounds of
data on dietary intakes for multiple age groups.
• Dietary data are essential to shape public policy on nutrition; financial and technical
investments are needed to scale up data availability in South Asia.
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2022
Targeting effectiveness indicates the extent to which program benefits are received by the neediest versus the less needy or non-needy population. A well-targeted intervention improves the real income, food consumption, and nutrition of the neediest without providing those benefits to members of society who are better off. As such, targeting benefits to those most in need is a cost-effective way of implementing a program.
Upon request from the Ministry of Women and Children Affairs (MoWCA) and the World Food Programme (WFP) in Bangladesh, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) undertook this study to develop indicators for targeting the urban poor through the Vulnerable Women’s Benefit (VWB) program in Bangladesh.
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Abedin, Naveen; Ghostlaw, Julie. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2020
Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2018
Ahmed, Akhter; Hoddinott, John; Menon, Purnima; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini; Younus, Masuma. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2018
Using rigorous research, namely, a randomized controlled trial design, IFPRI assessed impacts of the ANGeL project interventions on various outcomes. Over the 17-month implementation period, with no inputs provided to participating farm households besides knowledge from trainings, ANGeL generated useful lessons on strengthening the agriculture-nutrition-gender nexus in the country.
Both men and women benefited from agricultural trainings, yet women learned more from the same trainings. Crop diversity increased substantially in homestead gardens, mainly due to ANGeL’s emphasis on homestead food production from nutritious crops. Farmers also adopted improved production practices. We consistently found that women were more likely to apply knowledge gained from agricultural production trainings to adopt various types of improved agriculture production practices, such as pest disease and control, seed production and care, and use of quality fertilizer.
Similarly, improvements in nutrition knowledge were far greater for women and when trainings were combined. These improvements in knowledge had impacts on nutrition outcomes, with increases in household diet quality and child dietary diversity over the project period.
The strongest improvements in empowerment came when agriculture, nutrition, and gender sensitization trainings were combined. ANGeL’s household approach empowered women and men in unique ways: while women became more empowered in asset ownership and income decisions, men became more empowered in production and income decisions in select interventions. Attitudes related to gender of both women and men also improved, with more women recognizing that they make important contributions to their communities.
ANGeL is the first ministry-led initiative that uses a rigorous impact evaluation to develop an evidence base to design and implement a national program. The ANGeL project is a significant step towards filling critical knowledge and action gaps in the country on promoting nutrition-and gender-sensitive agriculture.
Ahmed, Akhter; Ghostlaw, Julie . Dhaka, Bangladesh 2019
Agricultural advancements have transformed Bangladesh from a food-deficit to surplus country. Now, agricultural innovations are needed to confront emerging challenges: the slowdown in agricultural growth, low agricultural diversity, the effects of climate change, and a rise in pest infestations and plant diseases, to name a few. Brinjal (eggplant) is a high-value crop widely grown and consumed in Bangladesh. Brinjal is highly vulnerable to the fruit and shoot borer pest, and farmers spray the crop heavily with pesticides. Farmers’ spending on pesticides reduces their income; and increased pesticide use heightens their risk of contracting pesticide-elated illnesses, and facing related medical costs. Developing modern, pest-resistant crop varieties can help tackle these issues.
Agricultural biotechnologies such as Bt brinjal hold promise. Although the Government of Bangladesh approved cultivation of 4 Bt varieties in 2013, evidence on their potential is still lacking.
What is the Bt Brinjal Study?
In 2017–2018, IFPRI and the Government of Bangladesh partnered to estimate the impacts of Bt brinjal on production systems, producer welfare, and health outcomes. The study was designed by IFPRI’s Bangladesh Policy Research and Strategy Support Program (PRSSP), implemented by the Ministry of Agriculture under the Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) and the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), and coordinated by the Agricultural Policy Support Unit (APSU). Project partners regularly monitored the brinjal plots throughout the implementation period. The Bt brinjal impact assessment was supported by the
Government of Bangladesh, the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM), and Cornell University
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Abedin, Naveen; Ghostlaw, Julie. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2020
Nguyen-Viet, Hung; Hoffmann, Vivian; Bett, Bernard; Fèvre, Eric; Moodley, Arshnee; Mateo-Sagasta, Javier; Mohan, Chadag; Daszak, Peter; Bonfoh, Bassirou. Nairobi, Kenya 2022
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Gilligan, Daniel O.; Hoddinott, John F.; Roy, Shalini. Washington, DC 2022
Ahmed, Akhter; Coleman, Fiona; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima; Parvin, Aklima; Pereira, Audrey; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini. Washington, DC 2022
Heckert, Jessica; Martinez, Elena M.; Seymour, Greg; Pereira, Audrey; Roy, Shalini; Kim, Sunny S.; Malapit, Hazel J.. 2023
Rahman, Mustafizur; Al-Hasan, Md.. 2022
Hossain, Mohammad Anwar; Shafin, Rubayet; Walton, Lori Maria; Raigangar, Veena; Jahid, Iqbal Kabir; Islam, Mir Raihanul. 2022
Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 2198 adult, COVID-19 survivors living in Bangladesh. Data were collected from previously diagnosed COVID-19 participants (confirmed by an RT-PCR test) via door-to-door interviews in the eight different divisions in Bangladesh. For data collection, Bengali-translated Brief COPE inventory and WHO Brief Quality of Life (WHO-QoLBREF) questionnaires were used. The data collection period was from October 2020 to March 2021.
Lecoutere, Els; van den Berg, Marrit; de Brauw, Alan. 2023
Dorosh, Paul A.; Shahabuddin, Quazi. Washington, DC 2002
Ahmed, Akhter U.; del Ninno, Carlo. Washington, DC 2002
Cato, James C.; Subasinge, S.. Washington, DC 2003
Garrett, James L.; Downen, Jeanne. Washington, DC 2001
Adato, Michelle; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela. Washington, DC 2002
Ambler, John; Pandolfelli, Lauren; Kramer, Anna; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela. Washington, D.C. 2007
Fontana, Marzia; Wobst, Peter; Dorosh, Paul A.. Washington, DC 2001
Fontana, Marzia. Washington, DC 2003
Li, Man; Guo, Zhe; Zhang, Wei. 2022
Ryan, James G.; Meng, Xin. Washington, DC 2004
Ahmed, Raisuddin. Washington, DC 1981
Verchot, Louis; Zhang, Wei. 2022
Verchot, Louis; Zhang, Wei. Montpellier, France 2022
Thai, Giang; Margolies, Amy; Gelli, Aulo; Kumar, Neha; Sultana, Nasrin; Choo, Esther; Levin, Carol. 2022
Neupane, Sumanta; Scott, Samuel; Jangid, Manita; Shapleigh, Sara; Kim, Sunny S.; Akseer, Nadia; Heidkamp, Rebecca A.; Menon, Purnima. Washington, DC 2022
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Anowar, Sadat; Rahman, Mohammad Moshiur. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Adato, Michelle; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela. Washington, DC 2002
Chen, Joyce; Mueller, Valerie; Durand, Fabien; Lisco, Erika; Zhong, Qing; Sherin, V. Raju; Islam, A. K. M. Saiful. 2022
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Tauseef, Salauddin; Khuong, Long Quynh; Gupta, Rajat Das; Billah, Masum; Menon, Purnima; Scott, Samuel. 2022
Rashid, Shahidur. Washington, DC 2002
Dorosh, Paul A.; Shahabuddin, Quazi; Aziz, M. Abdul. Washington, DC 2002
Ahmed, Raisuddin. Washington, DC 1979
Chowdhury, Reajul; Crost, Benjamin; Hoffmann, Vivian. 2022
Chowdhury, Reajul; Crost, Benjamin; Hoffman, Vivian. 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Ali, Masum; Ghostlaw, Julie; Nguyen, Phuong Hong. 2022
Nyangaresi, Annette M.; Friesen, Valerie M.; McClafferty, Bonnie; van der Merwe, Charl; Haswell, Daniel; Reyes, Byron; Mudyahoto, Bho; Mbuya, Mduduzi N. N.. Geneva, Switzerland 2022
Friesen, Valerie M; Mudyahoto, Bho; Birol, Ekin; Nyangaresi, Annette M; Reyes, Byron; Mbuya, Mduduzi N. N.. Geneva, Switzerland 2022
Hossain, Mahabub. Washington, DC 1988
Rashid, Shahidur; Sharma, Manohar; Zeller, Manfred. Washington, DC 2002
Hoddinott, John F.; Yohannes, Yisehac. Washington, DC 2002
Fontana, Marzia; Wobst, Peter. Washington, DC 2001
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, DC 2005
Iannotti, Lora L.; Cunningham, Kenda; Ruel, Marie T.. Washington, DC 2009
Grandner, Gargi Wable; Rasmussen, Kathleen M.; Dickin, Katerine L.; Menon, Purnima; Yeh, Tiffany; Hoddinott, John F.. 2022
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D.C. 2002
Escobar-DeMarco, Jessica; Ireen, Santhia; Kabir, Rowshan; Kundu, Gourob; Asaduzzaman, H. M.; Jahan, Rezwana; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Ash, Deborah. 2022
Diao, Xinshen; Dorosh, Paul A.; Smart, Jenny; Thurlow, James. Washington, DC 2022
Sanghvi, Tina; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Ghosh, Sebanti; Zafimanjaka, Maurice; Kim, Sunny S.. 2022
Roy, Shalini; Hidrobo, Melissa; Hoddinott, John F.; Koch, Bastien; Ahmed, Akhter. Madison, WI Article in press
de Brauw, Alan; Kramer, Berber. Washington, DC 2022
Masum Billah, Sk; Ferdous, Tarana E.; Siddique, Abu Bakkar; Raynes-Greenow, Camille; Kelly, Patrick; Gillespie, Stuart; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima. 2022
Mitu, Mst. Maxim Parvin; Islam, Khaleda; Sarwar, Sneha; Ali, Masum; Amin, Md. Ruhul. 2022
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Pramanik, Priyanjana; Billah, Sk. Masum; Avula, Rasmi; Ferdous, Tarana; Sarker, Bidhan K.; Rahman, Musfikur; Ireen, Santhia; Mahmud, Zeba; Menon, Purnima; Ash, Deborah. 2022
Roy, Devesh; Pradhan, Mamata; Boss, Ruchira; Rashid, Shahidur. Washington, DC 2022
Ahmed, Akhter; Coleman, Fiona; Ghostlaw, Julie; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima; Parvin, Aklima; Pereira, Audrey; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Roy, Shalini; Younus, Masuma. Washington, DC 2022
Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Raghunathan, Kalyani; Rashid, Shahidur; Dearlove, Honor; Chowdhury, Shyamal. Washington, DC 2022
Andam, Kwaw S.; Ezekannagha, Oluchi. Washington, DC 2022
Douthwaite, Boru; Johnson, Nancy L.; Wyatt, Amanda. Washington, DC 2022
Ecker, Olivier; Comstock, Andrew R.. Washington, DC 2021
Billah, Masum; Ali, Nazia Binte; Khan, Abdullah Nurus Salam; Raynes-Greenow, Camille; Menon, Purnima; Nguyen, Phuong Hong. 2022
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Singh, Nishmeet; Scott, Samuel; Neupane, Sumanta; Jangid, Manita; Walia, Monika; Menon, Purnima. 2022
Methods: We used data from the most recent (2015–2018) demographic and health surveys of mothers with children younger than 5 years in Afghanistan (n = 19 632), Bangladesh (n = 5051), India (n = 184 641), Maldives (n = 2368), Nepal (n = 3998), Pakistan (n = 8285) and Sri Lanka (n = 7138). We estimated co-coverage for a set of eight health and eight nutrition interventions and assessed within-country inequalities in co-coverage by wealth and geography. We examined opportunity gaps by comparing coverage of nutrition interventions with coverage of their corresponding health delivery platforms.
Findings: Only 15% of 231 113 mother–child pairs received all eight health interventions (weighted percentage). The percentage of mother–child pairs who received no nutrition interventions was highest in Pakistan (25%). Wealth gaps (richest versus poorest) for co-coverage of health interventions were largest for Pakistan (slope index of inequality: 62 percentage points) and Afghanistan (38 percentage points). Wealth gaps for co-coverage of nutrition interventions were highest in India (32 percentage points) and Bangladesh (20 percentage points). Coverage of nutrition interventions was lower than for associated health interventions, with opportunity gaps ranging from 4 to 54 percentage points.
Conclusion: Co-coverage of health and nutrition interventions is far from optimal and disproportionately affects poor households in south Asia. Policy and programming efforts should pay attention to closing coverage, equity and opportunity gaps, and improving nutrition delivery through health-care and other delivery platforms.
Hanifi, S. M. Manzoor Ahmed; Menon, Nidhiya; Quisumbing, Agnes R.. 2022
Tune, Samiun Nazrin Bente Kamal; Islam, Bushra Zarin; Islam, Mir Raihanul; Tasnim, Zarin; Ahmed, Syed Masud. 2022
Ahmed, Akhter; Hamadani, Jena Derakhshani; Hassan, Md. Zahidul; Hidrobo, Melissa; Hoddinott, John F.; Koch, Bastien; Raghunathan, Kalyani; Roy, Shalini. Washington, DC 2021
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Rabbani, Atonu. Washington, DC 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Hoddinott, John F.; Quabili, Wahid; Roy, Shalini. Washington, DC 2021
• The Transfer Modality Research Initiative (TMRI) was a pilot transfer program implemented in rural Bangladesh from 2012-2014, following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. TMRI provided either cash transfers or food transfers, with or without nutrition behavior change communication (BCC), to ultra-poor women and their family members in two regions of rural Bangladesh.
• The nutrition BCC entailed intensive weekly group-based nutrition training, home visits, and community meetings focused on infant and young child feeding and encouraged home production of nutritious foods.
• We conducted a phone survey in November 2021 to re-interview a subset of the households that participated in TMRI from 2012-2014. We aimed to assess any differences in how they were faring shortly after the devastating third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.
• We find that attrition in our phone survey is low relative to the intended sample, and not correlated with treatment. This allows us to assume that differences across the treatment and control arms in November 2021 are causal differences – that is, persistent effects of the different treatment arms implemented seven years earlier.
• Overall, we find that households that received a combination of cash transfers and intensive nutrition BCC from 2012-2014 fare significantly better in November 2021 than those in the control group or the other arms, although they nonetheless struggle in many dimensions.
• In November 2021, compared with the control group, former Cash+BCC households report experiencing significantly lower prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity, report a more diverse diet (being significantly more likely to consume eggs, dairy, and fruit in the previous seven days), report a slightly smaller share of main earners being unemployed, and report experiencing significantly less stress.
• Our findings suggest that providing poor rural households in Bangladesh with sizable cash transfers of long duration alongside intensive complementary programming, such as nutrition BCC, may help them cope with future shocks. Thus, such programming may be a cost-effective strategy to reduce households’ immediate and future food and nutrition insecurity.
Ahmed, Akhter; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Gilligan, Daniel O.; Hoddinott, John F.; Roy, Shalini; Anowar, Sadat; Al-Hasan, Md.; Ghostlaw, Julie. Washington, DC 2021
• With the onset of the pandemic, combined with the lockdown restrictions imposed from March through May 2020, moderate and severe food insecurity tripled to 45 percent. This was likely driven by income losses and difficulties accessing food because of shop closures.
• By January 2021, the proportion of moderately or severely food insecure households had largely returned to pre-pandemic levels. The September-October 2021 survey showed no meaningful further change in the prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity despite the strict national lockdown imposed in July-August 2021.
• A different picture emerges when we include the prevalence of mild food insecurity. The proportion of households reporting any food insecurity (mild, moderate or severe) increased from the pre-pandemic average of 45.7 percent to 87.8 percent in June 2020, before declining to 70.9 percent in January 2021 and 68 percent in September-October 2021. Dimensions of food insecurity that include consuming less diverse diets, being unable to eat healthy/nutritious food, and above all, being worried about not having enough food increased dramatically at the start of the pandemic and have remained elevated.
• Pre-pandemic, the majority of rural households in our sample were fully food secure; 18 months after the onset of the pandemic only 32 percent report no forms of food insecurity.
• In the immediate months after the outbreak (June 2020), many rural households coped by reducing expenditures on non-food goods, electricity and other utilities, and health-related items. The use of these forms of coping mechanisms has subsequently declined. However, the proportion of rural households that purchased food on credit (69 percent in June 2020) has barely changed and in all surveys fielded since the start of the pandemic, more than half of surveyed households have borrowed money to buy food. The continued use of savings and the ongoing use of credit to purchase food is consistent with the elevated levels of worry about not having enough food.
• A substantial share of rural households reported receiving cash or in-kind safety net support during the pandemic, mostly from government sources.
• Continued and expanded support from safety nets may be important, as many rural households face ongoing food insecurity and are using unsustainable coping strategies.
Douthwaite, Boru. Washington, DC 2021
Al-Emran, Hassan M.; Hasan, Md. Shazid; Setu, Md. Ali Ahasan; Rahman, M. Shaminur; Ul Alam, Rubayet A. S. M.; Sarkar, Shovon Lal; Islam, Md. Tanvir; Islam, Mir Raihanul; Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur; Islam, Ovinu Kibria; Jahid, Iqbal Kabir; Hossain, M. Anwar. 2022
Bangladesh introduced ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 since February, 2021 and in six months, only a small population (12.8%) received either one or two dose of vaccination like other low-income countries. The COVID-19 infections were continued to roll all over the places although the information on genomic variations of SARS-CoV-2 between both immunized and unimmunized group was unavailable. The objective of this study was to compare the proportion of immune escaping variants between those groups.
Methods
A total of 4718 nasopharygeal samples were collected from March 1 until April 15, 2021, of which, 834 (18%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. The minimum sample size was calculated as 108 who were randomly selected for telephone interview and provided consent. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and disease severity among both immunized and unimmunized groups was measured. A total of 63 spike protein sequences and 14 whole-genome sequences were performed from both groups and phylogenetic reconstruction and mutation analysis were compared.
Results
A total of 40 respondents (37%, N = 108) received single-dose and 2 (2%) received both doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, which significantly reduce dry cough, loss of appetite and difficulties in breathing compared to none. There was no significant difference in hospitalization, duration of hospitalization or reduction of other symptoms like running nose, muscle pain, shortness of breathing or generalized weakness between immunized and unimmunized groups. Spike protein sequence assumed 21 (87.5%) B.1.351, one B.1.526 and two 20B variants in immunized group compared to 27 (69%) B.1.351, 5 (13%) B.1.1.7, 4 (10%) 20B, 2 B.1.526 and one B.1.427 variant in unimmunized group. Whole genome sequence analysis of 14 cases identified seven B.1.351 Beta V2, three B.1.1.7 Alpha V1, one B.1.526 Eta and the rest three 20B variants.
Conclusion
Our study observed that ChAdOx1 could not prevent the new infection or severe COVID-19 disease outcome with single dose while the infections were mostly caused by B.1.351 variants in Bangladesh.
Bedi, Heather; Alam, Shamma; Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab. Washington, DC 2021
population vulnerability and the United Nation Sustainable Development Goals reveals which groups are most at risk of food insecurity and livelihood loss as Bangladesh experiences higher agricultural variability related to climatic change. Lessons learned from Bangladesh have global
implications, particularly for other developing countries experiencing agricultural transitions.
Hossain, Md. Tanjil; Babu, Suresh Chandra. 2021
Sanghvi, Tina; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Tharaney, Manisha; Ghosh, Sebanti; Escobar-Alegria, Jessica; Kim, Sunny S.. 2022
Dorosh, Paul A.; Pradesha, Angga; Raihan, Selim; Thurlow, James. Washington, DC 2021
"
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.; Mitra, Arun; Salman, Afsah; Akbari, Fawad; Dalil, Suraya; Menon, Purnima. 2021
The links between longstanding conflict, insecurity, and poverty are well recognised.23 Abject poverty, especially when associated with disparities, underlies many of the known conflicts worldwide, unsurprisingly given the drain conflict places on social sector spending. And although lack of social inclusion and ethnic inequalities have been shown to lead to domestic terrorism,4 economic inequalities and grievances are stronger drivers of rebellion,5 and are particularly relevant in South Asia. Despite robust economic growth and progress on many technological fronts, South Asia still has the world’s largest concentrations of poverty, illiteracy, malnutrition, and preventable maternal and child deaths outside sub-Saharan Africa.6 Widespread poverty is closely intertwined with social disparities, marginalisation on the basis of an egregious caste system, and vast inequities that perpetuate disillusionment, grassroot rebellion, and further conflict.
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Kachwaha, Shivani; Tran, Lan Mai; Sanghvi, Tina; Ghosh, Sebanti; Menon, Purnima. 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Islam, Nurul; Mujeri, Mustafa K.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
This book assembles a set of papers that collectively focus on the extensive undertaking of securing food for all in Bangladesh. The book addresses four broad issues: (1) agricultural technology adoption; (2) input use and agricultural productivity; (3) food security and output market; and (4) poverty, food security and women’s empowerment. The chapters, fifteen in total, address diverse aspects within these four themes.
Ahmed, Akhter, ed.; Islam, Nurul, ed.; Mujeri, Mustafa K., ed.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Herrington, Caitlin; Maredia, Mywish K.; Ortega, David L.; Taleon, Victor; Birol, Ekin; Sarkar, Md. Abdur Rouf; Rahaman, Md. Shajedur. 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Kaikaus, Ahmad. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Ahmed, Akhter, ed.; Islam, Nurul, ed.; Mujeri, Mustafa K., ed.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Access to sufficient food by all people at all times to meet their dietary needs is a matter of critical importance. Despite declining arable agricultural land, Bangladesh has made commendable progress in boosting domestic food production. The growth in overall food production has been keeping ahead of population growth, resulting in higher per capita availability of food over time. In the early 1970s, Bangladesh was a food-deficit country with a population of about 75 million. Today, the population is 165 million, and the country is now self-sufficient in rice production, which has tripled over the past three decades. Along with enhanced food production, increased income has improved people’s access to food. Furthermore, nutritional outcomes have improved significantly.
Nevertheless, the challenges to food and nutrition security remain formidable. Future agricultural growth and food and nutrition security are threatened by population growth, worsening soil fertility, diminishing access to land and other scarce natural resources, increasing vulnerability of crop varieties to pests and diseases, and persistent poverty leading to poor access to food. In addition, the impacts of climate change—an increase in the incidence of natural disasters, sea intrusion, and salinity—will exacerbate food and nutrition insecurity in the coming decades if corrective measures are not taken. Aligned with this context, the authors of the book explore policy options and strategies for developing agriculture and improving food security in Bangladesh.
Securing Food for All in Bangladesh, with its breadth and scope, will be an invaluable resource for policymakers, researchers, and students dedicated to improving people’s livelihoods in Bangladesh.
Dorosh, Paul A.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Shahabuddin, Quazi; Yunus, Mohammad; Islam, K. M. Nabiul. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Mujeri, Mustafa K.; Ahmed, Nazneen; Hossain, M. I.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Spielman, David J.; Ward, Patrick S.; Kolady, Deepthi Elizabeth; Ar-Rashid, Harun. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Tauseef, Salauddin. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Bell, Andrew R.; Bryan, Elizabeth; Ringler, Claudia; Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Zhang, Xiaobo; Rashid, Shahidur; Kaikaus, Ahmad; Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Islam, Nurul; Mujeri, Mustafa K.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Roy, Shalini; Hidrobo, Melissa; Hoddinott, John F.; Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Hernandez, Ricardo; Belton, Ben; Reardon, Thomas; Hu, Chaoran; Zhang, Xiaobo; Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Sraboni, Esha; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Ahmed, Akhter. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Hernandez, Ricardo; Naher, Firdousi. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Xie, Hua; Cenacchi, Nicola; Ringler, Claudia. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Naher, Firdousi; Spielman, David J.. Dhaka, Bangladesh 2021
Mueller, Valerie; Grépin, Karen A.; Rabbani, Atonu; Navia, Bianca; Ngunjiri, Anne S. W.; Wu, Nicole. 2022
Joarder, Taufique; Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Joarder, Mohammad A. I.. 2021
Methods: As this qualitative research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, data was gathered through seven online mixed-gender focus group discussions involving 50 purposively selected clinicians and non-clinicians.
Results: The study participants concurred that, from the outset, decision-makers failed to engage the right kind of experts, which resulted in poor pandemic management that included imposing lockdown in periphery areas without arranging patient transport to the center, declaring certain hospitals as COVID-19 dedicated without preparing the facilities or the staff, and engaging private hospitals in care without allowing them to test the patients for COVID-19 infection. Several participants also commented on ineffective actions on behalf of the GoB, such as imposing home quarantine instead of institutional, corruption, miscommunication, and inadequate private sector regulation. The perception of the people regarding service providers is that they lacked responsiveness in providing treatment, with some doctors misleading the public by sharing misinformation. Service providers, on the other hand, observed that decision-makers failed to provide them with proper training, personal protective equipment, and workplace security, which has resulted in a high number of deaths among medical staff.
Conclusions: The Bangladeshi health sector decision-makers should learn from their mistakes to prevent further unnecessary loss of life and long-term economic downturn. They should adopt a science-based response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the short term while striving to develop a more resilient health system in the long run.
Ahmed, Akhter; Tauseef, Salauddin. 2022
Seymour, Greg; Floro, Maria S.. 2021
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Guiteras, Raymond; Levinsohn, James; Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq. 2021
Basnet, Sulochana; Frongillo, Edward A.; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Moore, Spencer; Arabi, Mandana. 2022
Methods: We used baseline data from the Alive & Thrive household surveys collected in Bangladesh (n = 803) and Vietnam (n = 635). Resources for care were represented by maternal education, knowledge, height, well-nourishment, mental well-being, decision-making, employment, support in chores and perceived support. The regression analyses were adjusted for household wealth and other covariates on households, children and parents and accounted for geographical clustering.
Results: Maternal height (Bangladesh β = 0.150 p < 0.001, Vietnam β = 0.156 p < 0.001), well-nourishment (Vietnam β = 0.882 p = 0.007) and mental well-being (Bangladesh β = 0.0649 p = 0.008, Vietnam β = 0.0742 p = 0.039) were associated with child length. Well-nourishment (Vietnam β = 0.670 p = 0.042) and support in chores (Bangladesh β = 0.0983 p = 0.021) were associated with child motor development. Mental well-being (Vietnam β = 0.0735 p = 0.013), decision-making autonomy (Bangladesh β = 0.0886 p = 0.029) and perceived support (Vietnam β = 0.445 p = 0.003) were associated with child language development. Conclusion: Maternal height, well-nourishment, mental well-being, decision-making, support in chores and perceived social support were associated with child outcomes. Interventions that help to improve resources among mothers have potential to foster child growth and development.
COVID-19 Hub. Washington, DC 2021
Billah, Sk Masum; Ferdous, Tarana E.; Kelly, Patrick; Raynes-Greenow, Camille; Siddique, Abu Bakkar; Gillespie, Stuart; Hoddinott, John F.; Menon, Purnima. 2022
Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Heckert, Jessica; Faas, Simone; Ramani, Gayathri V.; Raghunathan, Kalyani; Malapit, Hazel J.; The pro-WEAI for Market Inclusion Study Team. 2021
Parvez, Mahmood; Islam, Mir Raihanul; Dey, Nepal C.. 2022
Dorosh, Paul A.; Thurlow, James; Pradesha, Angga; Raihan, Selim. Washington, DC 2021
Dorosh, Paul A.; Minot, Nicholas; Kabir, Razin; Hossain, Shahadat. Washington, DC 2021
Minot, Nicholas; Hossain, Shahadat; Kabir, Razin; Dorosh, Paul A.; Rashid, Shahidur. Washington, DC 2021
Andrade, Juan E.; Ali, Abu Noman Mohammad Atahar; Chowdhury, Reajul; Crost, Benjamin; Hoffmann, Vivian; Mustafa, Shoumi; Shaima, Nabila Afrin. Washington, DC 2021
Dorosh, Paul A.. Washington, DC 2021
Rashid, Shahidur; Kabir, Razin. Washington, DC 2021
Narayanan, Sudha; Lentz, Erin; Fontana, Marzia; Kulkarni, Bharati. 2022
Aheeyar, Mohamed; de Silva, Sanjiv; Barua, Anamika. Colombo, Sri Lanka 2021
Bryan, Elizabeth; Kato, Edward; Bernier, Quinn. 2021
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Shonchoy, Abu; Meki, Muhammad; Quinn, Simon. Oxford, UK 2021
In this project, we investigated the feasibility of ‘virtual migration’ by training rural youth in Bangladesh to become online freelancers, enabling them to export their labour services to a global online marketplace. We did this by setting up a ‘freelancing incubator’, which provided the necessary workspace and infrastructure – specifically, high-speed internet connectivity and computers. Close mentoring was also provided to participants to assist in navigating the competitive online marketplace.
We show the exciting potential of online work for improving the incomes of poor youth in developing countries. We also highlight the constraints to this type of work: financing constraints for the high training cost, access to the necessary work infrastructure, and soft skills requirements to succeed in the market.
We also shed light on some promising possibilities for innovative financial contracts and for ‘freelancing incubators’ or ‘virtual exporting companies’ to assist students in their sourcing of work and skills development.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Malapit, Hazel J.. 2022
Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Ahmed, Akhter; Hoddinott, John F.; Pereira, Audrey; Roy, Shalini. 2021
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Sununtnasuk, Celeste; Pant, Anjali; Tran, Lan Mai; Kachwaha, Shivani; Menon, Purnima. 2021
Ali, Zakari; Scheelbeek, Pauline F. D.; Sanin, Kazi Istiaque; Thomas, Timothy S.; Ahmed, Tahmeed; Prentice, Andrew M.; Green, Rosemary. 2021
Sununtnasuk, Celeste; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Pant, Anjali; Tran, Lan Mai; Kachwaha, Shivani; Menon, Purnima. 2021
Methods: We conducted longitudinal surveys with health care providers (n = 45), pregnant women (n = 40), and mothers of children < 2 years (n = 387) in February 2020 (in-person) and September 2020 (by phone). We used Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests to compare the changes before and during the pandemic. Results: Most services for pregnant women remained available during COVID-19 restrictions, with the provision of antenatal care (ANC) services falling by 6.6 percentage points (pp). Services for women and children which require proximity, however, were more severely affected; weight and height measurements fell by 20–29pp for pregnant women and 37–57pp for children, and child immunizations fell by 38pp. Declines in service utilization were large, including drops in facility visitations (35pp among pregnant women and 67pp among mothers), health and nutrition counseling (up to 73pp), child weight measurements (50pp), and immunizations (61pp). The primary method of adaptation was provision of services over phone (37% for ANC services and 44–49% for counselling of pregnant women or mothers with young children). Conclusions: Despite adaptations to service provisions, continued availability of routine maternal and child health services did not translate into service utilization. Further investments are needed to provide timely and accurate information on COVID-19 to the public, improve COVID-19 training and provide incentives for health care providers, and ensure availability of personal protective equipment for both providers and beneficiaries.
Li, Man; Guo, Zhe; Zhang, Wei. 2021
Islam, Aminul; Ahmed, Mohammad Tofayal; Mondal, Md. Hossain Alam; Awual, Md. Rabiul; Monir, Minhaj Uddin; Islam, Kamrul. 2021
Neupene, Sumanta; Scott, Samuel; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Menon, Purnima. 2021
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Scott, Samuel; Khuong, Long Quynh; Pramanik, Priyanjana; Ahmed, Akhter; Rashid, Sabina Faiz; Afsana, Kaosar; Menon, Purnima. 2021
Bakhtiar, M. Mehrab; Meki, Muhammad; Quinn, Simon; Shonchoy, Abu. 2021
Sen, Binayak; Dorosh, Paul A.; Ahmed, Mansur. 2021
We find that non-farm orientation has increased over the 2000 to 2013 period, and that nonfarm households rely more on salaried employment and less on unpaid work. Pseudo-panel data based on age-cohort of household heads from the Labor Force Survey (LFS) of 2000 and 2013 also shows a notable increase in mixed households formed by diversification of activities of formerly farm-only households. Employment patterns of younger households are changing especially rapidly: the share of mixed households among households with heads age 15–30 years increased from 17% to 30% in this period. Proximity to urban areas also is associated with a rapid shift in household employment patterns over time. In areas less than 2.5 kms from cities, the share of pure farm households fell from 46.5 to 30.3 percent of households, while the share of mixed households rose from 14.8 to 33.7 percent.
Overall, our findings confirm a process of transformation involving a shift from predominantly agriculture employment to increased non-farm employment. We find that the structural transformation considered does not necessarily involve large-scale permanent migration to cities. Rather, much of the shift out of agriculture occurs within rural areas with especially rapid change happening in areas of close proximity to cities.
de Brauw, Alan; Kramer, Berber; Murphy, Mike. 2021
Basnet, Sulochana; Frongillo, Edward A.; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Moore, Spencer; Arabi, Mandana. 2021
Bell, Andrew Reid; Wrathall, David J.; Mueller, Valerie; Chen, Joyce; Oppenheimer, Michael. 2021
Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Khương, Long Quỳnh; Pramanik, Priyanjana; Billah, Sk Masum; Menon, Purnima; Piwoz, Ellen; Leslie, Hannah H.. 2021
Chowdhury, Shyamal K.; Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Raghunathan, Kalyani; Rashid, Shahidur. 2020
Kumar, Anjani; Tripathi, Gaurav; Roy, Devesh; Islam, Abu Hayat Md. Saiful. Abingdon, Oxford, UK 2021
Kumar, Anjani; Sonkar, Vinay Kumar; Saroj, Sunil. Abingdon, Oxford, UK 2021
Kishore, Avinash; Alvi, Muzna; Krupnik, Timothy J.. 2021
Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Sproule, Kathryn; Martinez, Elena M.; Malapit, Hazel Jean L.. 2021
Scott, Samuel; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Neupane, Sumanta; Pramanik, Priyanjana; Nanda, Priya; Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.; Afsana, Kaosar; Menon, Purnima. 2021
De Pinto, Alessandro; Seymour, Gregory; Bryan, Elizabeth; Bhandari, Prapti. 2020
Fakir, Adnan M. S.; Abedin, Naveen. 2021
Ahmed, Akhter; Hoddinott, John F.; Abedin, Naveen; Hossain, Nusrat. 2021
Tran, Lan Mai; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Naved, Ruchira Tabassum; Menon, Purnima. Oxford, UK 2020
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Dhaka, Bangladesh 2020
Wable, Gargi; Dickin, Katherine; Kanbur, Ravi; Menon, Purnima; Rasmussen, Kathleen M.; Hoddinott, John F.. 2021
Filipski, Mateusz J.; Rosenbach, Gracie; Tiburcio, Ernesto; Dorosh, Paul A.; Hoddinott, John F.. 2021
Roy, Shalini; Hidrobo, Melissa. 2017
Ahmed, Akhter; Ahmed, Ishita; Hoddinott, John F.; Hidrobo, Melissa; Roy, Shalini. 2019
Seymour, Gregory; Malapit, Hazel J.; Quisumbing, Agnes R.. 2020