More Money for Men, Less Drudgery for Women

Women Farmers, Palghar, Thane district of Maharashtra, India Source: Md. Tajuddin Khan, IFPRI
Women Farmers, Palghar, Thane district of Maharashtra, India Source: Md. Tajuddin Khan, IFPRI

Women are major stakeholders in India’s agriculture. In 2011, women constituted nearly half (46.2 percent) of all agricultural laborers and one-third (32.9 percent) of all cultivators in India. Women’s contribution to cultivation of rice—India’s largest crop by area and production--is even higher as they contribute 60-80 percent of the labor required to grow the crop (Ricepedia, 2016). Women may have different preferences from in the families and adoption of new technologies or practices in agriculture may affect them differently. Still, both research and extension in India tend to ignore female farmers in understanding technology adoption and promoting new technologies and practices. In recent years, however, there is a growing emphasis in all development programs, including programs to promote climate-smart agriculture, to actively target female farmers, who are more vulnerable to climate change (Arora-Jonsson, 2011), but are often left out due to existing gender inequalities.

As a part of our research on Gender dimensions on farmers’ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India under the CGIAR Program on Climate Change and Food Security (CCAFS), we carried out a discrete choice experiment to examine the heterogeneity between male and female rice farmers’ preference for direct-seeded rice (DSR) with drum seeders in two predominantly rice growing districts of Maharashtra, India. Both Government of Maharashtra and Government of India have been promoting DSR as a climate smart technology that can reduce the labor required in rice cultivation and offer other benefits, such as yield gain, lower seed requirement, higher profits, more resilience to weather shocks and a reduced carbon footprint.

We enrolled both female farmers in our experiment about 337 women and 329 men farmers took part in our experiments. Of these, 542 men and women were from the same families.  Key findings from the study emerges are :-

  • Both female and male farmers prefer cheaper drum-seeders and would buy it only if it is subsidized significantly from its current market price;
  • Both groups have positive willingness to pay for increased yield, reduced seed rate and reduction in labor use, but;
  • They have different relative valuations of different attributes of the drum seeder: women value labor saving more than men while men value reduction in seed-rate and increase in yield more than women.
  • The overall willingness to pay (WTP) for drum-seeder is higher for women than the men. Further, women in our experiment are significantly more interested in switching from transplanted to direct-seeded rice. Each choice-set in our experiment offered respondents three options, including the status-quo option of continuing with the transplanted rice. Women were 20 percent less likely to choose the status-quo option than the men in their families.

For the study, we used the Women Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) to collect self-reported data on the role and say of women in agriculture. The respective gender roles in the family and on the farm, seem to explain some of these differences. Men have a greater say over how the family spends the cash. Accordingly, men tend to have a higher willingness to pay for attributes that increase income (increase in yield) or reduce cash costs (reduction in the seed rate). Women contribute a large share of the labor for transplanting rice, much of which is unpaid work on family farms. Women, therefore, seem to value labor saving significantly more than their male counterparts.

The study’s findings of women having higher WTP for a new technology runs somewhat contrary to the existing literature on technology adoption, which shows that women have slower observed rates of adoption of a wide range of technologies than men (Doss and Morris 2000) and lower WTP for new products, such as weather-indexed insurance (Akter et al. 2016), probably due to greater time and resource constraints, lower human capital endowment (education and exposure to the outer world), and poorer access to complementary inputs (Kamwamba-Mtethiwa et al. 2012). In our study, women are far more interested in and are willing to pay more for a new technology that promises to reduce the backbreaking work.

The WEAI data shows that women in rural Maharashtra work harder in rice cultivation, but they have a significantly lower say than the men in household decisions related to farming, such as choice of crops, inputs to buy, and the adoption and purchase of new technologies and equipment. This study also found, however, that although women have less say than the men in their families, they are not completely powerless. In fact, women do have a considerable say in many household decisions. Therefore, existing development programs, including agriculture extension, should not ignore women when promoting new climate-smart technologies, products, or practices, as ignoring women may reinforce the existing gender inequalities. Given women’s interest in new and better technologies, extension for the promotion of DSR drum seeder is likely to be more successful if it also targets female farmers and highlights the attributes of the technology that are of greater interest to them.

Read More:

Who Access Assets?

Konark Sikka is an intern with IFPRI-South Asia office

Women Farmer from Krishnagiri in Tamil Nadu, India. Source (flickr): Pallavi Rajkhowa/IFPRI
Women Farmer from Krishnagiri in Tamil Nadu, India. Source (flickr): Pallavi Rajkhowa/IFPRI

Gender disparities within farming communities still exist when it comes to household assets. A growing number of studies show that to ensure food security and nutritional security in a household, equal distribution of assets is necessary. Resolving this disparity would not only improve the lives of women farmers, but also in turn lead to more development and growth.

Based on a recent study on rice farmers in Uttar Pradesh, an IFPRI paper on Understanding Men’s and Women’s Access to and Control of Assets and the Implications for Agricultural Development Projects looks into the interplay of access to assets among men and women, and offers strategies to increase women’s control and access over key agricultural assets.

Owing to traditional social norms ingrained in society, men are the title holders for the land and the primary recipients in the case of inheritance. This means that the government provides benefits to the male, freezing out women from valuable opportunities to train themselves and receive farm inputs.

Ownership of dairy animals is also unequal, with animals reported as either owned by the husband or—in rare cases mostly in lower caste communities—jointly owned. Meanwhile, when it comes to ownership of machinery or post-harvest equipment, the study showed women were not owners and hence benefited almost nil from agricultural innovations.

An analysis of the adoption of technology also showed a difference between higher caste women and lower caste women:  women from lower castes make up most of the labor for production and post-harvest work, but their membership in farmer organizations, and access to training and credit sources is minimal.

The authors conclude that, despite some promising signs such as an increase in joint ownership of farmland and dairy stock, there are still a lot of disparities between the access to assets for men and women.  They identify a number of actions that could improve situation, including:

1.  instituting effective extension and education systems to enable women to get trained so that they can increase their sources of income;
2. reaching out to women with guidance and training through NGOs and self-help groups, in collaboration with government organizations,        to help improve their access to assets; and
3. involving more women farmers in participatory field experiments to increase their access to improved seeds and knowledge on how to better      manage their crops and natural resources.

New Abstract Digest on Maternal and Child Nutrition Research – Issue 7

We are pleased to release Issue 7 of our bi-monthly Abstract Digest on maternal and child nutrition. This issue features interesting publications examining nutrition from both a biological and political lens, in India and beyond. Highlights include:

Abstract Digest-Issue 07
Abstract Digest-Issue 07
Click to download PDF (708 Kb)

Abstract Digest-Issue 07

  • A special open-access issue of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences on integrating nutrition and early childhood development interventions
  • Two articles from Advances in Nutrition discussing 1) how nutrition research can become more useful in informing global nutrition guidelines (Stoltzfus 2014), and 2) arguing for the need to develop implementation science to enable stronger delivery of adequate nutrition to those in need (Habicht and Pelto 2014).
  • One study in Bio Medical Education identifying gaps in South Asian postgraduate nutrition programs to build capacity to address the current public health nutrition challenges (Khandelwal et al. 2014).
  • Two reviews, one providing an overview of the evidence-base for nutritional deficits in early life and greater risk for non-communicable diseases in later life (Langley-Evans 2014) and the other recommending investments in improving maternal autonomy to improve child nutritional status (Carlson et al. 2014).
  • Several articles focusing specifically on malnutrition in India, including on determinants of anemia (Anand 2013), vitamin A programming in India and its reach (Aguayo 2014), and management of severe acute malnutrition (Singh et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2013).

 

WHAT’s in a Name?

Women's focus group on Odisha, India
Women's focus group in Odisha, India

Land titling, gender, and food security in West Bengal, India

(Cross-posted from the IFPRI website written by Rebecca Sullivan)

In West Bengal, nearly 40 percent of children under the age of five are underweight, despite the country’s strong economic gains in recent years. This paradox indicates that food insecurity continues to pose major challenges for India’s state and national governments.

One key to solving the food security puzzle lies in land ownership and titling. Land ownership provides incentives to farmers to invest in agricultural practices and technologies that can increase productivity over the long term. What’s more, land titling among women has been shown to promote greater decisionmaking power among these women within their respective households. In their recent discussion paper, Can Government-Allocated Land Contribute to Food Security? Intrahousehold Analysis of West Bengal’s Microplot Allocation Program, former IFPRI research fellow Amber Peterman and colleagues examined a land allocation and registration program in West Bengal and explored the impacts of the program on food security throughout the state.

As a means of taking on the existing food security challenge, state governments have invested in programs such as Nijo Griha, Nijo Bhumi (NGNB), which parcels out small tracts of homestead land, purchased and titled by the government, to landless families. A hallmark of this program is that land titles (pattas) are to be issued in the woman’s name or jointly for both the man or woman heads of household.

IFPRI teamed up with Landesa, a nongovernmental organization that works on land issues that affect the poor, to evaluate the NGNB program and the effect it has had on food security among its participants. According to the authors, “Strengthening women’s rights to land can improve their ability to exercise control over those plots, can enhance women’s tenure security, and can strengthen their position within their households, give them the power to influence how resources are allocated, what is produced, and who consumes what.”

Collecting both qualitative and quantitative data through a series of household interviews and surveys between 2010 and 2012, the researchers zeroed in on four intermediate food security outcomes: perceptions of tenure security, use of credit for agricultural production, investments in agricultural production, and women’s participation in decisionmaking.

While the researchers did not uncover any substantial impacts of the program on current food security indicators, NGNB did indeed have a measurable impact on food security in the intermediate term. They also noted that, as the size of the plot of land grew, so did the following observed/perceived benefits. When NGNB-participating households were compared to non-participating households:

  • Participants felt more secure in their land tenure, encouraging productive investments in agriculture, such as the purchase of fertilizers, pesticides, seeds, and rental of machines and tools;
  • Because they felt more secure in their land ownership, these households were more willing to take out loans and access credit as a means of covering the cost of these investments;
  • Women on NGNB plots felt they had more control over the land and felt less likely to lose their land;
  • Women were more likely to have a voice in household decisions regarding food and agriculture; and
  • Women’s names on the land titles correlated with perceptions of improved tenure security and decisionmaking power within the household.

Related Materials

 

 

Women of Rural Pakistan

Originally posted on IFPRI's Blog World Hunger. Authored by Madeeha Hameed.

From former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto to student activist Malala Yousufzai, Pakistani women from all backgrounds and age groups have been transforming the discourse of gender roles in Pakistani society.

Pakistani Woman
Source: Flickr: © HelpAge International 2011. A Pakistani woman sewing for income.

And they are making a difference: in the midst of a changing political, social, and economic environment, political victories for women have been few but significant, including an Anti-Sexual Harassment Act, the creation of the National Commission on Status of Women, and a bill protecting women against domestic violence.

In rural Pakistan, women have a double burden: those who make economic contributions to their household are still expected to fulfill their traditional gender roles. IFPRI’s Pakistan Strategy Support Program recently interviewed 2090 households in rural areas of the country, and found that half of rural Pakistani women are economically active, working on their household farm, as wage workers, or running their own businesses. However, despite contributing to the household income, these women still are responsible for the main household chores. In fact, survey data on how women spend their time showed that those who are economically active spend slightly more time on household chores and domestic activities than their counterparts who are not economically active.

Clearly, efforts to enhance the welfare of women are still needed. Policies that promote gender equality and empowerment of women both inside and outside of the domestic sphere are one place to start.

Subscribe to our newsletter